#038 - Zara Stewart
#038 - Zara Stewart
Background
Facebook Profile Link - https://www.facebook.com/zara.stewart.3110
Now Ms.Stewart is in the United Kingdom so what exactly would she know about Mr Bentley in Tasmania?? Zara it doesn't matter whose baby it is - as I keep stating - and will continue to state - Mr Bentley attacked us (Bullied us) in the process of doing so (just like you) he didn't care what Public Profile Image he utilized at the time. He chose it, he chose to attack using that image, he can't complain after the event, he should be ashamed. Incidentally, it is no longer his image to claim copyright over as the terms and conditions of Facebook state quite clearly it is lawfully (c) Facebook because he uploaded it and handed over ownership to Mr Zuckerberg. Again, you are incorrect - My personal photos are already all-over social media and even the media (even my facebook one's) all as (c) Facebook. I'm not calling them Troll's please show me where because to state otherwise, publicly, is defamation as is the rest of your blurb.
So, on what grounds do you now have to threaten my nieces and nephews and the use of their images? Do you even know what you're talking about? Well - Now you are a Troll...
Ah, but you were before - here you are on my Facebook page ...
Oh, so instead of taking note and backing down no Zara just goes and makes it worse - Duh!! Not so bright this one - instead she makes a NEW profile
New Profile Link - https://www.facebook.com/zara.jayne.94 turns out she's really Zara Jane from Liverpool - here's her Public Image and what she messaged to the Seaman Dan Appreciation Group
Oh, and I can NOW add Adoption Breach to your list of crimes
Now Zara, you and I both know that Image isn't from Facebook! Also, stop pretending to be a lawyer the directions on the website were quite clear! So, your making threats here that you can't substantiate nor support - What you think the UK don't have authorities nor Internet connection? No, you're just thinking you can get away with this abuse because you are in the UK. I also note your defamation about my Walls and who are you associating with?? Mr Bentley? Aah so that's consorting to cause harm or conspiracy, isn't it??
Criminal Action under Queensland Law
1. Conspiracy:
Chapter 56 of Part 7 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 defines Conspiracy. Under section 543(1) any person who conspires with another to affect any of the purposes following, including:
Clause 543(1)(b) - to cause any injury to the person or reputation of any person;
Clause 543(1)(d) - to injure any person in the person’s trade or profession;
Clause 543(1)(f) - to effect any unlawful purpose; and
Clause 543(1)(g) - to effect any lawful purpose by any unlawful means
is guilty of a misdemeanor and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.
Therefore, this applies to ALL the members of the two private groups that they utilise to organise attacks, coerce people, and incite hatred against the Dorante-Day family are guilty of conspiracy. As are, those people they have worked with through the Portsmouth News and the Daily Star (Reach PLC).
2. Criminal Defamation:
Chapter 35 of Part 5 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 defines Criminal Defamation. Under section 365(1) any person who, without lawful excuse, publishes matter defamatory of another living person (a) knowing the matter to be false or without having regard to whether the matter is true or false; and (b) intending to cause serious harm to the relevant person or any other person or without having regard to whether serious harm to the relevant person or any other person is caused;
commits a misdemeanor, penalty 3 years imprisonment.
3. Unlawful Stalking:
Section 359B of Chapter 33A of the Queensland Criminal Code defines unlawful stalking as (a) intentionally directed at a person; (b) engaged in on any 1 occasion; and (c) consisting of 1 or more acts of the following, or a similar, type.
Section 359B(c)(iii) - contacting a person in any way, including, for example, by telephone, mail, fax, email or through the use of any technology;
Section 359B(c)(v) - giving offensive material to a person, directly or indirectly; and
Section 359B(c)(vi) - an intimidating, harassing or threatening act against a person, whether or not involving violence or a threat of violence;
Section 359B(d)(ii) - that causes detriment, reasonably arising in all the circumstances, to the stalked person or another person.
is under Section 359E(2) - guilty of a crime, penalty 5 years imprisonment.
4. Adoption Breaches
Adoption breaches under the Adoption Act 2009 (Qld) are outlined in the previously published image:
Offence under Australian Federal Law
A person commits an offence if they use a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence, according to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). A carriage service is defined in the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) as, "a service for carrying communications by means for guided and/or unguided electromagnetic energy", pursuant to section 7 of the Act.
In simple terms, this could be taken to refer to social media communications, emails, text messages and calls.
