#005 - Lorraine Drayton
#005 - Lorraine Drayton
Background
Facebook Profile link - https://www.facebook.com/lorraine.rose.90260403
Actual Identity - #025 - Lorraine Douglas
Lorraine,
The first step in bringing you to justice was unveiling your mask persona - well we've done that - the second part of that is exposing just why you are really doing what you are doing. That's why you needed a fake persona to hide just what's really at heart. You state in your group and on your Reddit blog the concocted reasons for why you're doing this (see images below), but you and I know really why! I'm sure Amanda does too! So, you do have an alteria motive you are not as transparent as you portray.
Now I ask you the same question I asked Amanda! What makes you think you have a) the right to do what you are doing; and b) Where do you think you are going to hide when the truth is shown of what you and your group of trolls are about and why you’re really doing it. Let's face it when I was migrating to Australia you weren't even born - let alone ever been to Drayton - so you wouldn't know about the real history of all this. You are not a member of the Day family, nor the Bowlden family, nor the "they who must not be mentioned family" so why are you doing this? You are the Publisher of the whole thing, so you are going to carry the legal blame for it! Which bit of that don't you see? Do you all believe your lies to each other? I think your hate has blinded your actions. You SHOULD be afraid of being sued because you should be BUT that's not enough for me. Nor for what you've done. You have criminally breached, with abandon, consorted with others to attack my family and me. You have no regard for my well-being or that of my family. You forget you are relying soley on "hearsay" and "Third hand gossip". In a court that's all you have!
Now rather than waste your life and your time pursuing me why don't you, as we have already told you, take your "evidence" or "proof" to the Authorities either there in Perth or to the UK - Federally even if your game. Better still take it straight to Charles. You won't, however, be showing them anything they haven't already seen. Just because you don't believe they have doesn't mean it hasn't happened Lorraine nor that you have any right to challenge it. Which is why you can't! All I've seen and heard is accusations and slander no legitimate action. However, the same can't be said for me. I have done the right and legal thing all the way through. You haven't you aren't telling the whole story only bits of paper that aren't connected - what happened in between Lorraine? I will give you one (1) tiny example of what you don't say! Karen was not, as according to your blog, born in Portland. Nor was she born in Portsmouth. So, it's between the lines that you have missed - but then when your vision and thinking is blurred with anger, revenge, and spite that's all you will see.
Coming soon ...
Criminal Action under Queensland Law
1. Conspiracy:
Chapter 56 of Part 7 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 defines Conspiracy. Under section 543(1) any person who conspires with another to affect any of the purposes following, including:
Clause 543(1)(b) - to cause any injury to the person or reputation of any person;
Clause 543(1)(d) - to injure any person in the person’s trade or profession;
Clause 543(1)(f) - to effect any unlawful purpose; and
Clause 543(1)(g) - to effect any lawful purpose by any unlawful means
is guilty of a misdemeanor and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.
Therefore, this applies to ALL the members of the two private groups that they utilise to organise attacks, coerce people, and incite hatred against the Dorante-Day family are guilty of conspiracy. As are, those people they have worked with through the Portsmouth News and the Daily Star (Reach PLC).
2. Criminal Defamation:
Chapter 35 of Part 5 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 defines Criminal Defamation. Under section 365(1) any person who, without lawful excuse, publishes matter defamatory of another living person (a) knowing the matter to be false or without having regard to whether the matter is true or false; and (b) intending to cause serious harm to the relevant person or any other person or without having regard to whether serious harm to the relevant person or any other person is caused;
commits a misdemeanor, penalty 3 years imprisonment.
3. Unlawful Stalking:
Section 359B of Chapter 33A of the Queensland Criminal Code defines unlawful stalking as (a) intentionally directed at a person; (b) engaged in on any 1 occasion; and (c) consisting of 1 or more acts of the following, or a similar, type.
Section 359B(c)(iii) - contacting a person in any way, including, for example, by telephone, mail, fax, email or through the use of any technology;
Section 359B(c)(v) - giving offensive material to a person, directly or indirectly; and
Section 359B(c)(vi) - an intimidating, harassing or threatening act against a person, whether or not involving violence or a threat of violence;
Section 359B(d)(ii) - that causes detriment, reasonably arising in all the circumstances, to the stalked person or another person.
is under Section 359E(2) - guilty of a crime, penalty 5 years imprisonment.
4. Adoption Breaches
Adoption breaches under the Adoption Act 2009 (Qld) are outlined in the previously published image:
Offence under Australian Federal Law
A person commits an offence if they use a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence, according to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). A carriage service is defined in the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) as, "a service for carrying communications by means for guided and/or unguided electromagnetic energy", pursuant to section 7 of the Act.
In simple terms, this could be taken to refer to social media communications, emails, text messages and calls.
