#017 - Richard Bentley
#017 - Richard Bentley
Background
Facebook Profile link - https://www.facebook.com/ilovejesusforeverloljokes
It's not hard to see where you got it from Richard
>
Mr. Bentley your comprehension is very poor - I hadn't even got to your actions before you emailed me.
So, firstly thank you for this information:
Secondly, your offences itemised for the criminal defence lawyer you are seeking:
Criminal Action under Queensland Law
Section 359B of Chapter 33A of the Queensland Criminal Code defines unlawful stalking as (a) intentionally directed at a person; (b) engaged in on any 1 occasion; and (c) consisting of 1 or more acts of the following, or a similar, type.
Section 359B(c)(iii) - contacting a person in any way, including, for example, by telephone, mail, fax, email or through the use of any technology;
Section 359B(c)(v) - giving offensive material to a person, directly or indirectly; and
Section 359B(c)(vi) - an intimidating, harassing or threatening act against a person, whether or not involving violence or a threat of violence;
Furthermore, under Section 359B(d)(ii) her action - causes detriment, reasonably arising in all the circumstances, to the stalked person or another person.
Offence under Australian Federal Law
A person commits an offence if they use a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence, according to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). A carriage service is defined in the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) as ‘a service for carrying communications by means for guided and/or unguided electromagnetic energy’, pursuant to s7 of the Act. In simple terms, this could be taken to refer to social media communications, emails, text messages and calls.
Finally, evidence of the offence here:
Hey, Richard - you published the photo on Facebook publicly - not me - it is evident you don't understand the Law in regard to this. Now you came over to the Seaman Dan Appreciation Group looking for trouble, showing disrespect wherever you could. You left insulting messages for my wife and I to find - these are your PRIMARY ACTION(S).
How come its ok for you and the FPDU mob to do exactly, what you have stated - you think I don't know what they do? You think I am stupid enough to not inform the authorities about what you and they are doing? It's good to see that you admit knowing that uploading people's private documentation is highly illegal - maybe you could inform Lorraine Drayton of the same - she doesn't seem to listen very well! Attacking an Australian family just because you think you can is reprehensible. I guess you don't like how it feels!
I'll be waiting for the Police call, but somehow, I think you are going to be very disappointed - I mean your actions are being witnessed globally - not only by the Police.
I would also point out that you were clearly informed to contact via a Lawyer - there is a reason for that - you've admitted six breaches not one in your statement - Duh!
However, its more!
Oh, and as per your legal request I modified the post - more than happy to oblige. I hope you appreciate the clarification!!
One more thing - my wife and I think you probably should have that DNA test because apart from the "Grimace" you don't appear to have much in common! Just an Opinion!
So, this isn't you?? Odd, because it links straight to your profile Dicky.
Four days ago - so 20/09/2022
Now he's stalked me to my private profile and sends me messages there - is there no end to this moron - mate get yourself down the Police Station tomorrow and dob yourself in because that's what you're doing in complaining about me.
Show them what you did first then see how keen they are to listen King Stalker - take my advice and seek legal advice before you send me anymore evidence!
Well, Mr. Bentley has continued his Criminal stalking behaviors, despite being warned, and has now added some Civil defamation about my Wife, and her qualifications.
My question is where they are getting this misinformation from to make such ignorant, insulting, and offensive comments. The FPDU are responsible for this type of defamation.
In his Fake Elvianna Profile that Mr Bentley created he messaged us with lovely comments
Sounds like menacing and harassing to most people
Well ACTUALLY she is and the Government know that!
See Richard, Adoption isn't everyone's business - its private - not public that's what an Adoption Breach is...
Criminal Action under Queensland Law
1. Conspiracy:
Chapter 56 of Part 7 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 defines Conspiracy. Under section 543(1) any person who conspires with another to affect any of the purposes following, including:
Clause 543(1)(b) - to cause any injury to the person or reputation of any person;
Clause 543(1)(d) - to injure any person in the person’s trade or profession;
Clause 543(1)(f) - to effect any unlawful purpose; and
Clause 543(1)(g) - to effect any lawful purpose by any unlawful means
is guilty of a misdemeanor and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.
Therefore, this applies to ALL the members of the two private groups that they utilise to organise attacks, coerce people, and incite hatred against the Dorante-Day family are guilty of conspiracy. As are, those people they have worked with through the Portsmouth News and the Daily Star (Reach PLC).
2. Criminal Defamation:
Chapter 35 of Part 5 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 defines Criminal Defamation. Under section 365(1) any person who, without lawful excuse, publishes matter defamatory of another living person (a) knowing the matter to be false or without having regard to whether the matter is true or false; and (b) intending to cause serious harm to the relevant person or any other person or without having regard to whether serious harm to the relevant person or any other person is caused;
commits a misdemeanor, penalty 3 years imprisonment.
3. Unlawful Stalking:
Section 359B of Chapter 33A of the Queensland Criminal Code defines unlawful stalking as (a) intentionally directed at a person; (b) engaged in on any 1 occasion; and (c) consisting of 1 or more acts of the following, or a similar, type.
Section 359B(c)(iii) - contacting a person in any way, including, for example, by telephone, mail, fax, email or through the use of any technology;
Section 359B(c)(v) - giving offensive material to a person, directly or indirectly; and
Section 359B(c)(vi) - an intimidating, harassing or threatening act against a person, whether or not involving violence or a threat of violence;
Section 359B(d)(ii) - that causes detriment, reasonably arising in all the circumstances, to the stalked person or another person.
is under Section 359E(2) - guilty of a crime, penalty 5 years imprisonment.
4. Adoption Breaches
Adoption breaches under the Adoption Act 2009 (Qld) are outlined in the previously published image:
Offence under Australian Federal Law
A person commits an offence if they use a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence, according to s.474.17 the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). A carriage service is defined in the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) as, "a service for carrying communications by means for guided and/or unguided electromagnetic energy", pursuant to section 7 of the Act.
In simple terms, this could be taken to refer to social media communications, emails, text messages and calls.
